WASHINGTON — NASA has accepted plans to proceed with the following important milestone within the Artemis 1 mission, a maneuver by the uncrewed Orion spacecraft because it flies by the moon Nov. 21.
NASA introduced late Nov. 19 that the Artemis 1 mission administration crew accepted the outbound powered flyby (OPF) maneuver, a burn by Orion’s primary engine because the spacecraft passes about 130 kilometers above the lunar floor. The maneuver will ship Orion out in the direction of a distant retrograde orbit across the moon.
The burn, slated to final two and a half minutes, is scheduled for 7:44 a.m. Japanese Nov. 21. The maneuver will happen whereas the spacecraft is behind the moon, throughout a 34-minute blackout interval between 7:25 a.m. and seven:59 a.m. Japanese when the spacecraft shouldn’t be in communication with Earth.
“That is completely a important burn. It’s one which Orion has to carry out,” mentioned Jim Geffre, Orion car integration supervisor at NASA’s Johnson House Middle, throughout a Nov. 18 briefing. The burn might be completed by the principle engine or a number of auxiliary thrusters if there’s a drawback with the principle engine. “We designate it as important, which it why we configured the software program to make sure that burn occurs.”
A second maneuver, scheduled for Nov. 25, will insert Orion into the distant retrograde orbit, going so far as 432,000 kilometers from the Earth. It can stay in that orbit for six days earlier than performing two extra maneuvers to exit the orbit and fly by the moon once more, returning to Earth.
On the briefing, company officers mentioned Orion had been working effectively since its Nov. 16 launch on the check flight. “General, the mission, in simply three quick days, is continuing and exceeding expectations,” mentioned Mike Sarafin, Artemis 1 mission supervisor, on the Nov. 18 briefing.
The mission has not been problem-free, although. He mentioned they reviewed 13 anomalies, most of which he mentioned had been “comparatively benign” and studying about system efficiency. One concern, with the spacecraft’s star trackers, did require convening an anomaly decision crew that concluded its work by the Nov. 18 briefing.
Sarafin mentioned the difficulty with the star trackers was “dazzling” of the imagers by thruster plumes. “The thrusters had been being picked up by the star tracker as a result of it was thrusting over the sphere of view of the star tracker, by design,” he mentioned. “The sunshine was hitting the plume and it was choosing it up,” complicated the software program.
“The star tracker itself is performing completely,” Geffre mentioned, noting the difficulty got here from a mixture of things that might not be absolutely simulated on the bottom. He mentioned he expects to see the difficulty “periodically” by the remainder of the mission however the crew now is able to deal with it.
The issue by no means violated flight guidelines, mentioned Jeff Radigan, a flight director. “It was actually a case that we had been seeing one thing that we didn’t perceive,” he mentioned. “Always they had been offering us measurements that had been capable of permit the mission to proceed.”
Sarafin mentioned the company was additionally nonetheless assessing the efficiency of the House Launch System rocket that launched Orion. “All indications had been that the system carried out spot-on,” he mentioned, noting that the core stage and boosters positioned Orion and its ICPS higher stage very near its deliberate altitude, and that the ICPS burn that despatched Orion to the moon “was precisely the place we had supposed.”
The launch additionally triggered some injury to floor programs, just like the cellular launch platform, creating hazards on the pad that delayed photographers from choosing up distant cameras for 2 days. That included nitrogen and helium gasoline leaks, in addition to elevator blast doorways that had been blown off, taking the cellular launcher elevator out of service, in response to Sarafin.
“We did anticipate some quantity of harm, and they’re discovering some quantity of harm,” he mentioned. “The cellular launcher itself carried out effectively. We’re simply having to work our means by a number of the injury assessments.”